ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Recherche archivistique historique comparative×Méthode de l'histoire orale×
DomaineMéthodes de terrainMéthodes de terrain
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origineLate 19th century (archival foundations); mid-20th century (comparative systematic application)1948 (systematic practice); broader theorisation 1970s–1990s
Auteur d'origineLeopold von Ranke (archival history); Theda Skocpol, Barrington Moore (comparative-historical synthesis)Columbia University Oral History Research Office (Allan Nevins); later theorised by Alessandro Portelli and Donald Ritchie
TypeQualitative comparative research designQualitative historical-empirical method
Source fondatriceSkocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521294997Ritchie, D. A. (2015). Doing Oral History (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199329960
Aliascomparative-historical analysis, cross-national archival research, comparative archival history, CHARoral history research, life history interviewing, oral testimony research, OHM
Apparentées66
RésuméComparative historical archival research combines systematic examination of primary archival sources across two or more historical cases — nations, regions, institutions, or time periods — to identify causal patterns, structural similarities, and divergences that single-case histories cannot reveal. It is the method of choice when researchers want to explain why similar or different outcomes emerged across distinct historical contexts using documentary evidence.The oral history method is a qualitative research approach in which researchers conduct in-depth, recorded interviews with individuals who have direct personal experience of a historical event, social process, or community life. It captures subjective perspectives, memory, and lived experience that written records rarely preserve, making it indispensable for recovering voices absent from official archives — particularly those of marginalised communities, minority groups, and ordinary people.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Comparative Historical Archival Research · Oral History Method. Consulté le 2026-06-20 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare