Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Recherche quantitative comparative exploratoire× | Recherche par enquête× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Conception de la recherche | Conception de la recherche |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | Mid-to-late 20th century | Late 19th century; methodologically systematised 1940s–1960s |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | No single originator; codified in quantitative research methodology traditions (20th century) | Francis Galton, Charles Booth, and early social statisticians; systematised by Paul Lazarsfeld and colleagues at Columbia in the 1940s |
| Type≠ | Quantitative research design | Quantitative (and mixed) non-experimental design |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1452226101 | Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey Research Methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1452259000 |
| Alias | exploratory comparative quantitative design, comparative exploratory survey research, quantitative comparative exploration, CEQR design | survey methodology, questionnaire research, survey design, survey study |
| Apparentées≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | Comparative exploratory quantitative research is a design that uses structured numerical data collection to discover patterns, differences, and relationships across two or more distinct groups or conditions — without a fully specified hypothesis in advance. It sits at the intersection of exploratory intent and comparative structure: the researcher does not enter the field with a predetermined answer but organises the inquiry around a comparison that will generate quantitative insights. The design is common in social, educational, and behavioural sciences when a phenomenon is insufficiently understood to permit confirmatory testing but structured group comparison is still feasible and informative. | Survey research is a quantitative (and sometimes mixed-methods) design in which a researcher collects standardised self-report data from a sample drawn from a defined population, using a questionnaire or structured interview. It is the dominant non-experimental strategy for describing population characteristics, estimating prevalence, mapping attitude distributions, and testing bivariate or multivariate associations across social, behavioural, and health sciences. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|