Comparer des méthodes

	Autoethnographie comparative	Étude de cas comparative
Domaine	Qualitatif	Qualitatif
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	1979 (autoethnography); comparative application formalized ~2013	1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake)
Auteur d'origine	Hayano (term); developed further by Ellis, Bochner, Chang, Ngunjiri & Hernandez	Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake
Type	Qualitative research design	Qualitative / mixed research design
Source fondatrice	Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978-1598745948	Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169
Alias	collaborative autoethnography, multi-sited autoethnography, cross-cultural autoethnography, CAE	cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis
Apparentées	6	4
Résumé	Comparative autoethnography is a qualitative design in which two or more researchers — or research participants — independently produce first-person self-narratives about a shared phenomenon and then systematically compare those accounts to generate broader cultural insight. By juxtaposing lived experiences that differ by context, identity, or setting, the approach moves beyond the single-voice limitations of traditional autoethnography while retaining its hallmark reflexivity and personal depth.	Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods.