ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Raisonnement de sens commun en TALN×Génération augmentée par récupération (RAG)×
DomaineFouille de textesFouille de textes
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine2019 (landmark benchmarks)2020
Auteur d'origineSap et al. (ATOMIC, 2019); Zellers et al. (HellaSwag, 2019)Lewis, Patrick et al. (Meta AI / Facebook AI Research)
TypeNLP reasoning taskHybrid retrieval + generation pipeline
Source fondatriceSap, M. et al. (2019). ATOMIC: An Atlas of Machine Commonsense for If-Then Reasoning. AAAI. link ↗Lewis, P. et al. (2020). Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 33, 9459-9474. DOI ↗
Aliascommonsense NLP, if-then reasoning, Sağduyu Akıl Yürütme (Commonsense Reasoning)RAG, retrieval-augmented LLM, grounded generation, Erişim Destekli Metin Üretimi (RAG)
Apparentées67
RésuméCommonsense reasoning in NLP refers to the capacity of a language model or inference system to draw on implicit, world-knowledge facts that humans take for granted — facts not stated in the text — to answer questions, complete stories, or interpret dialogue. Landmark benchmarks formalising the task include ATOMIC (Sap et al., 2019), an if-then commonsense knowledge graph, and HellaSwag (Zellers et al., 2019), a sentence-completion challenge that exposed gaps in machine understanding of everyday events.Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a natural-language-processing pipeline introduced by Lewis et al. in 2020 that strengthens a large language model (LLM) with evidence fetched at inference time from an external knowledge base. Instead of relying solely on what a model memorised during training, RAG first retrieves the most relevant passages from a document index and then hands those passages to the LLM as context, grounding the generated answer in verifiable, up-to-date information. The approach reduces hallucination and allows domain-specific or time-sensitive knowledge to be injected without retraining the model.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Commonsense Reasoning · Retrieval-Augmented Generation. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare