Comparer des méthodes

	Conception d'étude de cohorte	Conception d'étude transversale
Domaine	Recherche clinique	Recherche clinique
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	1970s-1980s	1950s-1970s
Auteur d'origine	Donald Acheson, Olli Miettinen, and others in modern epidemiology	Epidemiologists in the mid-20th century; formalized by Kelsey, Rothman, and others
Type	Research Design	Research Design
Source fondatrice	Miettinen, O. S. (1976). Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 103(2), 226–235.	Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195083299
Alias	prospective study, follow-up study, longitudinal study, cohort study	prevalence study, cross-sectional survey, snapshot study, survey design
Apparentées	2	2
Résumé	A cohort study follows a group of individuals forward in time from exposure to outcome. Exposed and unexposed participants (or participants with differing exposure levels) are enrolled at baseline, characterized, and observed prospectively until the outcome occurs or the study ends. Cohort studies are fundamental to epidemiology and are the design of choice for establishing causal associations when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical.	A cross-sectional study (or prevalence study) measures exposure and outcome simultaneously at a single point in time, producing a 'snapshot' of a population. Respondents are recruited and surveyed (or examined) on the same occasion, capturing current prevalence of both exposure and disease. Cross-sectional studies are simple, quick, and inexpensive, making them popular for needs assessments, surveillance, and generating hypotheses—though they cannot establish causality due to lack of temporal sequence.