Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Analyse de la couverture de code× | Test de partitionnement par équivalence× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Génie logiciel | Génie logiciel |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1988 | 1979 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Test Coverage Community | Glenford Myers |
| Type≠ | measurement and analysis | partitioning strategy |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Zhu, H., Hall, P. A. V., & May, J. H. R. (1997). Software unit test coverage and adequacy. ACM Computing Surveys, 29(4), 366–427. DOI ↗ | Myers, G. J. (1979). The Art of Software Testing. John Wiley & Sons. link ↗ |
| Alias | coverage metrics, test coverage, instrumentation-based measurement | equivalence partitioning, BVA, boundary value analysis |
| Apparentées | 4 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | Code coverage analysis measures the extent to which source code is executed by a test suite, quantifying which lines, branches, or paths are exercised. Tools instrument code to track execution, reporting coverage percentages and identifying untested regions. Coverage analysis guides test creation, detects dead code, and validates test adequacy in quality assurance processes. | Equivalence partitioning divides input domains into equivalence classes—sets of inputs expected to behave identically—then selects test cases from each class. Introduced by Myers (1979), this technique reduces test cases while maintaining effectiveness. Boundary value analysis (BVA) complements partitioning by testing values at partition boundaries where failures often occur. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|