Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Expérience adaptative randomisée en grappes× | Expérience à bras multiples× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Plans d'expériences | Plans d'expériences |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1990s–2000s (clinical formalization); multi-arm concept implicit in ANOVA-era factorial designs |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Synthesised from cluster randomization methodology (Donner, 1978; Donner & Klar, 2000) and adaptive design frameworks (Bauer & Kohne, 1994; Pallmann et al., 2018) | Developed within clinical trials methodology; formalized by Parmar, Royston and colleagues (UK MRC CTU, early 2000s) |
| Type | Experimental design | Experimental design |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Hayes, R. J., & Moulton, L. H. (2017). Cluster Randomised Trials (2nd ed.). CRC Press / Chapman & Hall. ISBN: 978-1498728225 | Royston, P., Parmar, M. K. B., & Qian, W. (2003). Novel designs for multi-arm clinical trials with survival outcomes with an application in ovarian cancer. Statistics in Medicine, 22(14), 2239–2256. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | adaptive cluster RCT, adaptive group-randomized trial, cluster adaptive design, adaptive cluster trial | multi-arm trial, multiple-arm experiment, multi-group experiment, many-arm design |
| Apparentées | 5 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | A cluster randomized adaptive experiment combines two methodological principles: (1) intact groups such as schools, clinics, or villages are randomly assigned to treatment conditions rather than individuals, and (2) pre-specified rules allow the design to be modified during the trial based on accumulating cluster-level data. Adaptations may include dropping underperforming arms, reallocating clusters, or adjusting sample size, while maintaining statistical validity and controlling Type I error. | A multi-arm experiment simultaneously compares three or more treatment or intervention conditions — each called an arm — against a shared control or against one another. By testing multiple alternatives in a single study, it yields more information per participant than running separate two-group experiments sequentially, while controlling the overall Type I error rate through pre-specified comparison strategies. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|