Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Échelle de fatigue de Chalder (ÉF Chalder)× | Échelle de Fatigue Liée au Cancer (CFS)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Soins infirmiers en oncologie | Soins infirmiers en oncologie |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1993 | 2000 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Trudie Chalder | Takuo Okuyama |
| Type≠ | Patient self-report fatigue scale with physical and mental subscales | Patient self-report three-dimensional fatigue scale |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Chalder, T., Berelowitz, G., Pawlikowska, T., et al. (1993). Development of a fatigue scale. J Psychosom Res, 37(2), 147–153. DOI ↗ | Okuyama, T., Akechi, T., Kugaya, A., et al. (2000). Development and validation of a cancer fatigue scale: a brief, three-dimensional, disease-specific instrument. J Pain Symptom Manage, 19(1), 5–14. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | CFS, Chalder Fatigue Scale, Fatigue Scale | CFS, Okuyama Fatigue Scale |
| Apparentées | 5 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | The Chalder Fatigue Scale is an 11-item brief self-report instrument measuring physical and mental fatigue, developed by Trudie Chalder and colleagues at St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, in 1993. Originally designed for chronic fatigue syndrome (myalgic encephalomyelitis/ME) research, the CFS has been extensively validated across cancer populations, chronic illness, and general populations. The scale offers two scoring options: continuous 0–33 scale for severity measurement or bimodal 0–11 scoring for caseness determination, making it versatile for both research and clinical screening. | The Cancer Fatigue Scale is a 15-item disease-specific self-report instrument that comprehensively assesses three dimensions of cancer-related fatigue: physical, cognitive, and emotional. Developed by Takuo Okuyama and colleagues at the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research and published in 2000, the CFS provides a brief yet multidimensional fatigue profile suitable for both clinical practice and research, with particular strength in non-English-speaking populations where it has been extensively validated. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|