Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Extension complexe de EDAS× | Corrélation des critères et écart-type pour la pondération objective× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2002 | 2010 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Ramot, D. Milo, R. Friedman, M. Kandel, A. | Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. |
| Type≠ | Complex outranking/ranking — Complex Fuzzy Set (CFS: amplitude r ∈ [0,1], phase ω ∈ [0,2π]) | Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Ramot, D., Milo, R., Friedman, M., Kandel, A. (2002). Complex fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems DOI ↗ | Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Apparentées | 8 | 8 |
| Résumé≠ | CF-EDAS (Complex extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Ramot, D. Milo, R. Friedman, M. Kandel, A. in 2002. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|