ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Corrélation des critères et écart-type pour la pondération objective×Évaluation combinatoire basée sur la distance×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine20102016
Auteur d'origineWang, Y. M., Luo, Y.Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J.
TypeCorrelation-penalised standard-deviation weightingDistance from anti-ideal (Euclidean + Taxicab)
Source fondatriceWang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. (2016). A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research link ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméCCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CODAS (Combinative Distance-Based Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: CCSD · CODAS. Consulté le 2026-06-15 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare