ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Corrélation des critères et écart-type pour la pondération objective×COmprehensive distance Based RAnking×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine20102022
Auteur d'origineWang, Y. M., Luo, Y.Krstić, M., Agnusdei, G. P., Tadić, S., Kovač, M., Miglietta, P. P.
TypeCorrelation-penalised standard-deviation weightingDistance from PIS/NIS/AS (Euclidean × Taxicab combined)
Source fondatriceWang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗Krstić, M., Agnusdei, G. P., Tadić, S., Kovač, M., Miglietta, P. P. (2022). A Novel Axiomatic DEA-COBRA Framework for Evaluating the Sustainable Performance of Agri-Food Systems. Sustainability link ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméCCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.COBRA (COmprehensive distance Based RAnking) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Krstić, M., Agnusdei, G. P., Tadić, S., Kovač, M., Miglietta, P. P. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: CCSD · COBRA. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare