ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Algorithmes de découverte causale (PC, FCI, LiNGAM)×Identification causale avec les graphes acycliques dirigés (do-calculus)×
DomaineInférence causaleInférence causale
FamilleRegression modelRegression model
Année d'origine20002009
Auteur d'origineSpirtes, Glymour & Scheines (PC/FCI); Shimizu et al. (LiNGAM)Judea Pearl
TypeCausal structure learningCausal identification framework
Source fondatriceSpirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (2000). Causation, Prediction, and Search (2nd ed.). MIT Press. ISBN: 978-0262194402Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521895606
AliasPC algorithm, FCI algorithm, LiNGAM, causal structure learningdo-calculus, backdoor adjustment, Pearl causal identification, DAG ile Nedensel Tanımlama (do-calculus)
Apparentées55
RésuméCausal discovery is a family of algorithms that automatically learn a directed acyclic graph (DAG) describing causal structure directly from observational data. The constraint-based PC and FCI algorithms were developed by Spirtes, Glymour and Scheines (2000), while the LiNGAM model of Shimizu et al. (2006) exploits linear non-Gaussian structure to orient edges.DAG causal identification is a framework, developed by Judea Pearl (2009), that encodes causal assumptions as a directed acyclic graph and uses the do-calculus rules to determine whether and how a causal effect can be identified from observational data. It systematically handles confounders, instrumental variables, and backdoor paths.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Causal Discovery Algorithms · DAG Causal Identification. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare