Comparer des méthodes

	Liste de contrôle CASP pour les essais randomisés contrôlés	PRISMA Checklist
Domaine	Méthodologie de la recherche	Méthodologie de la recherche
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	1993 (updated through 2023)	2021 (original 2009)
Auteur d'origine	Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (Oxford, UK)	Page et al. (PRISMA Group)
Type	Clinician-rated / Research team assessment	Systematic review author reporting checklist
Source fondatrice	Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (1993, updated). CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist. University of Oxford, UK. www.casp-uk.net	Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.
Alias	CASP-RCT, CASP	PRISMA, PRISMA 2020
Apparentées	4	4
Résumé	The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist is a practical, widely adopted tool developed by the UK-based Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (founded 1993) for assessing the methodological quality and relevance of published randomized controlled trials. Unlike numeric scoring scales, it uses 11 structured questions with yes/no/cannot tell responses to guide critical appraisal in a format accessible to busy clinicians, researchers, and educators.	PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is a 27-item evidence-based checklist published in 2021 (updated from 2009) to standardize reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Endorsed by over 500 journals, PRISMA is the international standard for evidence synthesis reporting, used across healthcare, psychology, education, and social sciences to ensure transparency and reproducibility.