Comparer des méthodes

	Échelle d'évaluation de la sévérité de l'aphasie de Boston	L'échelle d'évaluation de la confiance en communication pour l'aphasie
Domaine	Orthophonie	Orthophonie
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	2001	2003
Auteur d'origine	Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B.	Various (emerging self-report literature)
Type	Clinician-rated	Self-report
Source fondatrice	Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination–Third Edition (BDAE-3). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0-683-30562-9	Bays, C. L. (2003). Stroke Recovery: What Does the Literature Tell Us? Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 35(5), 250–260.
Alias	BDAE, Boston Aphasia Rating Scale, Boston Aphasia Severity	CCRS, CRSA, Communication Confidence Scale
Apparentées	3	3
Résumé	The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination Severity Rating Scale (BDAE-SRS) is the gold-standard clinician-administered assessment of aphasia severity and type in adults following stroke or acquired brain injury. Developed by Goodglass, Kaplan, and colleagues (2001, third edition), BDAE provides comprehensive evaluation of language across 18 domains (auditory comprehension, oral expression, naming, repetition, reading, writing) and yields both an overall severity rating (0–5 scale) and a detailed profile classifying aphasia syndrome (Broca's, Wernicke's, conduction, global, etc.). BDAE is foundational to aphasia diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment planning.	The Communication Confidence Rating Scale (CCRS or CRSA) is a brief self-report measure of perceived communication self-efficacy and confidence in communication situations among adults with aphasia. Unlike objective measures of language ability (Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination) or quality-of-life impact (Aphasia Impact Questionnaire), the CCRS focuses specifically on confidence—the degree to which a person with aphasia believes they can successfully communicate in everyday scenarios. High CCRS scores reflect psychological readiness to engage in communication despite linguistic deficits; low scores indicate anxiety and avoidance despite preserved communication ability.