Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Blockmodeling× | Triad Census× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Sociology | Sociology |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1976 | 1970 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Harrison White, Scott Boorman & Ronald Breiger | Paul Holland & Samuel Leinhardt |
| Type≠ | Network partitioning into positions and a reduced role structure | Enumeration of the 16 isomorphism classes of directed triads |
| Source fondatrice≠ | White, H. C., Boorman, S. A., & Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 730–780. DOI ↗ | Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1970). A method for detecting structure in sociometric data. American Journal of Sociology, 76(3), 492–513. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | block modeling, blockmodel analysis, generalized blockmodeling, CONCOR | triad count, triadic census, 16-type triad census, MAN triad census |
| Apparentées | 4 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | Blockmodeling is a family of methods that simplify a social network by partitioning its actors into positions — groups of actors who are equivalent in their pattern of ties — and summarizing the relations between positions as a compact image, or reduced role structure. Introduced by Harrison White, Scott Boorman, and Ronald Breiger in 1976, it shifts attention from individuals to the structural roles they occupy. | The triad census counts how many of a directed network's three-actor subgroups fall into each of the 16 possible types of triad, providing a compact fingerprint of the network's local structure. Introduced by Paul Holland and Samuel Leinhardt in 1970, it is the standard way to test structural theories — balance, clustering, transitivity, ranked clusters — by comparing the observed distribution of triad types against what a random network would produce. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|