ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Plan expérimental bloqué avec prétest et post-test×Conception expérimentale avec groupe témoin×
DomainePlans d'expériencesPlans d'expériences
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1935 (blocking, Fisher); 1963 (pretest-posttest + blocking synthesis, Campbell & Stanley)1935 (Fisher); 1963 (Campbell & Stanley codification)
Auteur d'origineDonald T. Campbell & Julian C. Stanley (systematized); blocking technique from Ronald A. FisherRonald A. Fisher; systematised by Donald T. Campbell & Julian C. Stanley
TypeExperimental designExperimental research design
Source fondatriceCampbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally. link ↗Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally. link ↗
Aliasblocked pre-post design, RBPP design, block-randomized pretest-posttest design, randomized block pre-post control group designcontrolled experiment, true experimental design, randomized controlled design, treatment-control design
Apparentées64
RésuméThe blocked pretest-posttest experimental design combines blocking — grouping participants into homogeneous strata before randomization — with pre- and post-intervention measurement. Blocking controls for known sources of variability (e.g., baseline ability, gender, site), while the pretest-posttest structure quantifies change scores directly. Together, they reduce error variance and increase statistical power compared to a simple pretest-posttest design, making this approach well suited to educational, clinical, and behavioral intervention studies.Control group experimental design is a fundamental experimental structure in which participants are assigned to at least two groups — a treatment group that receives the intervention and a control group that does not — so that the effect of the intervention can be isolated by comparing outcomes across groups. Randomisation of assignment strengthens causal inference by balancing known and unknown confounders.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Blocked Pretest-Posttest Experimental Design · Control Group Experimental Design. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare