ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Revue cartographique assistée par bibliometrix×Revue exploratoire×
DomaineScientométrieScientométrie
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine2017 (bibliometrix tool); mapping review approach formalised c. 2010s2005
Auteur d'origineAria & Cuccurullo (bibliometrix, 2017); mapping review methodology developed in evidence synthesis community (~2000s)Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
TypeTool-assisted evidence mapping reviewEvidence synthesis review design
Source fondatriceAria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. DOI ↗Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI ↗
Aliasbibliometrix mapping review, R-bibliometrix evidence map, bibliometric-assisted systematic map, bibliometrix evidence synthesis mapscoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
Apparentées56
RésuméA bibliometrix-assisted mapping review combines the structured scope-and-search logic of an evidence mapping review with the analytical power of the bibliometrix R package. Instead of manually categorising studies, the researcher leverages bibliometrix functions — keyword co-occurrence networks, thematic clustering, and yearly trend analysis — to chart the landscape of a research field systematically and at scale, producing an interactive, reproducible evidence map.A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: bibliometrix-assisted mapping review · Scoping Review. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare