Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Pondération Bayésienne par Score de Propension× | Pondération par l'inverse de la probabilité de traitement (IPW / IPTW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Inférence causale | Inférence causale |
| Famille | Regression model | Regression model |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2009 | 2000 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | McCandless, Gustafson & Austin | Robins, Hernán & Brumback |
| Type≠ | Bayesian causal weighting estimator | Causal inference weighting estimator |
| Source fondatrice≠ | McCandless, L. C., Gustafson, P., & Austin, P. C. (2009). Bayesian propensity score analysis for observational data. Statistics in Medicine, 28(1), 94–112. DOI ↗ | Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | Bayesian PSW, Bayesian IPW, Bayesian inverse probability weighting, Bayesian propensity weighting | IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting |
| Apparentées≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | Bayesian Propensity Score Weighting estimates causal treatment effects in observational data by combining a Bayesian model for the propensity score with inverse probability weighting. By placing a prior over propensity-score parameters and propagating posterior uncertainty through the weighting step, this approach yields fully probabilistic uncertainty intervals for the average treatment effect, accounting for the uncertainty in both the score model and the outcome. | Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|