ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Détection des odeurs architecturales×Modèle de prédiction de défauts×
DomaineGénie logicielGénie logiciel
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine20092005
Auteur d'origineMartin Fowler and García et al.Thomas Ostrand, Elaine Weyuker, Robert Bell
Typepattern-based analysismachine learning model
Source fondatriceFowler, M. (2018). Code smell. Martin Fowler's Website. link ↗Ostrand, T. J., Weyuker, E. J., & Bell, R. M. (2005). Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(4), 340–355. DOI ↗
Aliasdesign smell detection, architectural debt analysis, system quality assessmentfault prediction, bug prediction, defect classification
Apparentées44
RésuméArchitecture smells are recurring patterns in system structure that indicate potential design problems. Introduced by García et al. (2009), these patterns signal violations of architectural principles (modularity, independence, abstraction) at system scale. Detection combines code metrics, dependency analysis, and pattern recognition to identify smells early, guiding refactoring and architectural improvements.Defect prediction models forecast the likelihood of software faults in code modules using statistical or machine learning approaches. Pioneered by Ostrand, Weyuker, and Bell (2005), these models correlate code metrics (complexity, churn, coupling) with historical defect data to identify high-risk components. Organizations use predictions to allocate testing resources, guide code review, and prioritize refactoring.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Architecture Smell Detection · Defect Prediction Model. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare