Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Processus d'analyse hiérarchique× | Modèles de localisation-affectation× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine≠ | Prise de décision | Analyse spatiale |
| Famille≠ | MCDM | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1980 | 1963 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Saaty, T. L. | Leon Cooper; S. L. Hakimi |
| Type≠ | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Spatial facility-location optimization |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Cooper, L. (1963). Location-allocation problems. Operations Research, 11(3), 331–343. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | — | facility location, p-median problem, maximal covering location problem, yer-tahsis modelleri |
| Apparentées≠ | 8 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | Location-allocation models decide where to place a set of facilities and simultaneously assign demand points to them so as to optimize an objective such as total travel cost, worst-case distance, or population covered. Rooted in the operations-research work of Cooper (1963) and Hakimi (1964) and central to network GIS, they answer questions like where to site warehouses, hospitals, fire stations, or schools to best serve a spatially distributed population. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|