Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Processus d'analyse hiérarchique× | Méthode de Copeland× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1980 | 1951 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Saaty, T. L. | Copeland, A. H. |
| Type≠ | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Pairwise majority rule (Condorcet-based aggregation) |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Copeland, A. H. (1951). A 'reasonable' social welfare function. Mimeograph, University of Michigan Seminar on Applications of Mathematics to Social Sciences link ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Apparentées≠ | 8 | 0 |
| Résumé≠ | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | COPELAND (Copeland Method — Pairwise majority voting with net win-loss score) is a aggregationoperator multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Copeland, A. H. in 1951. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|