Comparer des méthodes

	Processus d'analyse hiérarchique	Évaluation du rapport additif	AROMAN
Domaine	Prise de décision	Prise de décision	Prise de décision
Famille	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Année d'origine	1980	2010	2022
Auteur d'origine	Saaty, T. L.	Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.	Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
Type	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)	Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
Source fondatrice	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy	Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering
Alias	—	—	—
Apparentées	8	8	8
Résumé	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.