Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Recherche-action× | Analyse narrative× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine≠ | Recherche qualitative | Qualitatif |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1946 | 1967 (foundational); 2008 (canonical handbook) |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury | Catherine Kohler Riessman (seminal synthesis, 2008); roots in Labov & Waletzky (1967) |
| Type≠ | Method | Qualitative interpretive method |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗ | Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | Participatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry | narrative inquiry, life history analysis, biographical research, Anlatı Analizi (Narrative Analysis) |
| Apparentées≠ | 1 | 6 |
| Résumé≠ | Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement. | Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method, synthesised canonically by Catherine Kohler Riessman (2008), that examines how individuals storise their lived experiences and construct meaning through the telling. Drawing on life history, biographical, and narrative inquiry traditions, it treats the story itself — not just its content — as the unit of analysis, attending to temporal sequence, plot structure, and the social context in which a narrative is produced. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|