Controversy Mapping
Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.
Lue koko menetelmä
Kirjaudu sisään maksuttomalla tilillä lukeaksesi tämän osion.
Menetelmäkartta
Lähimenetelmien naapurusto — valitse solmu tutkiaksesi.
Lähteet
- Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. DOI: 10.1177/0963662509102694 ↗
- Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558 ↗
Näin viittaat tähän sivuun
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/fi/science-technology-studies/controversy-mapping
Mikä menetelmä?
Aseta tämä menetelmä lähimpien sukulaistensa rinnalle ja lue niitä yhdessä — kirjasto asettaa teokset pöydälle; valinta on sinun.
- Actor-Network Theory AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ vertaa
- Boundary-Work AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ vertaa
- Social Construction of TechnologyScience Technology Studies↔ vertaa
- Sociotechnical Imaginaries AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ vertaa
Tähän viittaavat
Samankaltaiset menetelmät
Huomasitko virheen tällä sivulla? Ilmoita siitä tai ehdota korjausta →