Participant Debriefing Procedures
Participant debriefing is a post-study conversation or disclosure providing information to participants after research participation concludes. Debriefing serves multiple ethical purposes: (1) explaining the research aims and design, (2) revealing any deception (if applicable), (3) addressing misconceptions, (4) offering support if the research caused discomfort, (5) providing information about study findings, and (6) ensuring participants understand their rights (e.g., right to withdraw data). Debriefing is especially important in research involving deception (participants must learn the truth), sensitive topics (participants may experience distress), or invasive procedures (participants deserve explanation). The American Psychological Association's Ethical Code, ESOMAR guidelines, and international research ethics frameworks emphasize debriefing as a core protective procedure.
Lähdetietue
Sitaatit kopioitu sanatarkasti metodin lähdetietueesta. Niistä ei päätellä väitteiden tasoista varmennusta.
- American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Section 8.08 - Debriefing. · URL
- ESOMAR. (2016). ESOMAR Guideline: Conducting Qualitative Research Ethically. Data Collection Ethics. · URL
- The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. · URL
- Williamson, V., & Williams, M. (2011). Using Narratives to Assess Ethical Issues in Longitudinal Research. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 3(1), 92-106. · URL
Kuratoituja väitteitä
Väitteet tallennettu todistusaineiston pääkirjaan, jokaisella oma arviointinsa.
Tämä näkymä ei keksi väitteen arviointia, jos pääkirjassa ei ole sitä.
Liittyvät metodit
Luotu metodigraafista ja näytetään koneen ehdottamina suhteina – väitteitä ei päätellä.