Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Lisäarvomallinnus× | Tapaus-kohorttimalli× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Psykometriikka | Psykometriikka |
| Menetelmäperhe | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1998 | 1986 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | William Sanders, Sandra Horn | Ross Prentice |
| Tyyppi≠ | Longitudinal student achievement modeling | Partial cohort sampling design |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Kane, T. J., Rockoff, J. E., & Staiger, D. O. (2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 615-631. DOI ↗ | Prentice, R. L. (1986). A case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials. Biometrika, 73(1), 1-11. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet≠ | VAM | — |
| Liittyvät | 4 | 4 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Value-Added Modeling (VAM) is a method for assessing the contribution of schools or teachers to student achievement growth, developed by Sanders and Horn (1998). VAM isolates the effect of a teacher or school by comparing student gains (value added) while controlling for prior achievement and student characteristics. | Case-cohort design is an epidemiological study design developed by Prentice (1986) that efficiently combines features of case-control and cohort studies. Researchers enroll an entire cohort, follow it for outcomes, then measure exposures only on cases and a random subcohort, reducing measurement costs while maintaining valid causal inference. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|