Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Lyhyt nomologinen validiteetti× | Käsitevaliditeetti× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Psykometriikka | Psykometriikka |
| Menetelmäperhe | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1955 (concept); 2000 (short-form context) | 1955 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); Smith et al. for short-form application | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| Tyyppi≠ | Validity assessment technique | Validity evaluation framework |
| Alkuperäislähde | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | nomological validity of abbreviated scales, short-scale construct validity, nomological network validity, abbreviated form external validity | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation |
| Liittyvät≠ | 4 | 6 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Short form nomological validity examines whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale preserves the pattern of theoretically expected correlations with conceptually related and unrelated constructs. It is a cornerstone step in justifying the use of a shortened instrument in research and applied settings. | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|