Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Tunnistus (herkkyys)× | Tarkkuus× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Mallien arviointi | Mallien arviointi |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi | 20th century | 20th century |
| Kehittäjä | Historical statistical foundations | Historical statistical foundations |
| Tyyppi | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| Alkuperäislähde | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet≠ | Sensitivity, True Positive Rate, TPR | Positive Predictive Value, PPV |
| Liittyvät | 5 | 5 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Recall measures the proportion of actual positive cases that were correctly identified by the classifier. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases that were truly positive, how many did we find?' Recall is critical in scenarios where missing positive cases is costly. | Precision measures the proportion of positive predictions that were actually correct. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases we predicted as positive, how many were truly positive?' Precision is critical in scenarios where false positives are costly. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|