Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| PCA-painotus× | Additiivinen suhdearviointi× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Päätöksenteko | Päätöksenteko |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1901 | 2010 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Pearson, K. | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| Tyyppi≠ | Weight_Objective (PCA variance explained, eigenvector-based) | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Pearson, K. (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine DOI ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | — | — |
| Liittyvät | 8 | 8 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | PCA-WEIGHT (PCA Weighting — Principal Component Analysis based objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pearson, K. in 1901. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|