Vertaile menetelmiä

	Osallistava suullinen historia – yhteisökeskeinen muistitutkimus	Osallistava toimintatutkimus (PAR)
Tieteenala	Laadulliset menetelmät	Laadulliset menetelmät
Menetelmäperhe	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Syntyvuosi	1970s–1990s (formalized participatory dimension by 1990)	1940s (Lewin); PAR as distinct tradition formalised ~1970s–1980s
Kehittäjä	Michael Frisch (shared authority concept); broader roots in Alessandro Portelli and oral history movement	Kurt Lewin (action research foundations, 1940s); systematised for participatory contexts by Orlando Fals Borda, Paulo Freire, and William Foote Whyte
Tyyppi	Qualitative participatory research design	Qualitative research method
Alkuperäislähde	Frisch, M. (1990). A Shared Authority: Essays on the Craft and Meaning of Oral and Public History. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791402481	Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer.
Rinnakkaisnimet	community oral history, collaborative oral history, participatory memory research, POH	PAR, community-based participatory research, collaborative action research, participatory inquiry
Liittyvät	5	6
Tiivistelmä	Participatory oral history is a qualitative research design in which community members act as co-researchers alongside academic investigators to collect, interpret, and share first-person accounts of lived experience and collective memory. Drawing on Michael Frisch's concept of 'shared authority,' it repositions research participants as active agents in the knowledge-production process rather than passive informants, making it especially powerful for documenting marginalized voices and community-held histories that would otherwise remain invisible in official archives.	Participatory Action Research (PAR) is a qualitative, community-centred methodology in which researchers and community members collaborate as co-investigators to identify a shared problem, take deliberate action, observe outcomes, and reflect critically on results — cycling iteratively until meaningful change is achieved. Unlike conventional research that studies people from the outside, PAR treats participants as active agents who co-own the research process, the knowledge produced, and the practical interventions that follow.