Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Alkuperäinen tutkimusartikkeli× | Meta-analyysi× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Tieteellinen kirjoittaminen | Tieteellinen kirjoittaminen |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1665 | 1976 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Scientific research community | Glass (1976, term coining); Fisher and Pearson (statistical foundations) |
| Tyyppi | Document Type | Document Type |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. ICMJE. link ↗ | Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | research paper, empirical article, primary research, journal article | quantitative synthesis, meta-synthesis, pooled analysis, statistical integration |
| Liittyvät≠ | 5 | 2 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | An original research article is the primary vehicle for reporting new empirical findings in a discipline. Following the IMRaD structure (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion), it represents a researcher's novel data, analysis, and interpretation. The journal article format has been the gold standard for scientific communication since the establishment of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society in 1665. | Meta-analysis is the statistical pooling of quantitative findings from multiple independent studies to produce a combined effect estimate. By aggregating data across studies, meta-analysis increases statistical power, reduces random error, and provides a precise summary of an intervention's effectiveness or an association's magnitude. Gene V. Glass coined the term in 1976, formalizing a technique that has become indispensable for evidence synthesis in medicine, psychology, education, and other evidence-based disciplines. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|