Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Mikrokeskiarvoistettu F1× | Tarkkuus× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Mallien arviointi | Mallien arviointi |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2000s | 20th century |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Multi-class evaluation community | Historical statistical foundations |
| Tyyppi | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | Micro F1, Frequency-weighted average F1 | Overall Accuracy, Correct Classification Rate |
| Liittyvät≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Micro-averaged F1 computes the F1-score by aggregating true positives, false positives, and false negatives across all classes, then calculating a single metric. It is equivalent to accuracy in multi-class classification and is useful when class distributions reflect their natural importance. | Accuracy is the proportion of correct predictions among the total number of predictions made by a classification model. It is the most intuitive performance metric and measures how often the classifier makes correct predictions overall, regardless of class. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|