ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Mendelian Randomisaatio×Regressioepäjatkuvuussuunnittelu (RDD)×
TieteenalaKausaalipäättelyKausaalipäättely
MenetelmäperheRegression modelRegression model
Syntyvuosi19972008
KehittäjäGeorge Davey SmithImbens & Lemieux (guide to practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik (practical introduction)
TyyppiGenetic instrumental variable frameworkQuasi-experimental causal design
AlkuperäislähdeDavey Smith, G., & Hemani, G. (2014). Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Human Molecular Genetics, 23(R1), R89-R98. DOI ↗Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗
RinnakkaisnimetMRRDD, regression discontinuity design, sharp RDD, fuzzy RDD
Liittyvät25
TiivistelmäMendelian randomization is a method for estimating causal effects of exposures on outcomes using genetic variants as instrumental variables. Introduced by George Davey Smith in the 1990s, it exploits Mendel's law of segregation to remove confounding bias. It has become a cornerstone technique in epidemiological causal inference.Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that identifies a causal effect by locally comparing units just above and just below a cutoff on a continuous assignment (running) variable. Formalised for applied work by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and developed as a practical framework by Cattaneo, Idrobo, and Titiunik (2020), it estimates a local average treatment effect (LATE) at the threshold.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 3 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: Mendelian Randomization · Regression Discontinuity. Haettu 2026-06-18 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare