Vertaile menetelmiä

	Selitettävä Naive Bayes	Päätöspuu	Logistinen regressio
Tieteenala	Koneoppiminen	Koneoppiminen	Tutkimuksen tilastomenetelmät
Menetelmäperhe	Machine learning	Machine learning	Process / pipeline
Syntyvuosi	1950s (Naive Bayes); 2000s–2010s (explainability focus)	1984	1958
Kehittäjä	Zhang, H. (explainability framing); Naive Bayes: Good, I. J.	Breiman, Friedman, Olshen & Stone	David Roxbee Cox
Tyyppi	Probabilistic generative classifier with intrinsic explainability	Recursive partitioning (if-then rules)	Method
Alkuperäislähde	Rish, I. (2001). An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier. In IJCAI Workshop on Empirical Methods in AI (pp. 41–46).	Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A. & Stone, C.J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth.	Cox, D. R. (1958). The regression analysis of binary sequences. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 20(2), 215–242.
Rinnakkaisnimet	XNB, interpretable Naive Bayes, transparent Naive Bayes, explainable probabilistic classifier	Karar Ağacı (Decision Tree), karar ağacı, classification tree, regression tree	logit model, binomial logistic regression, LR
Liittyvät	4	5	3
Tiivistelmä	Explainable Naive Bayes extends the classic probabilistic Naive Bayes classifier with transparent, human-readable explanations of its predictions. By surfacing class priors, per-feature likelihoods, and log-odds contributions, it offers the interpretability demanded in high-stakes domains such as medicine, law, and education without sacrificing the simplicity and speed that make Naive Bayes a reliable baseline.	A Decision Tree is an interpretable classification and regression method, formalised by Breiman, Friedman, Olshen and Stone in their 1984 CART framework, that partitions the data with hierarchical if-then rules. Each split sends observations down one branch or another until a prediction is read off the leaf.	Logistic regression is a statistical method for modeling the probability of a binary outcome (disease present/absent, success/failure) as a function of continuous and categorical predictors. Developed by David Roxbee Cox (1958), it solves the problem of predicting categorical outcomes by applying a logistic transformation to constrain predictions to the [0,1] probability interval, enabling accurate risk stratification, diagnostic prediction, and causal inference in epidemiology, medicine, and social science.