Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Event Data Analysis× | Wordfish Scaling× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Political Science | Political Science |
| Menetelmäperhe≠ | Process / pipeline | Latent structure |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | — | 2008 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Conflict-studies and computational-social-science traditions (McClelland, Schrodt, King) | Jonathan Slapin and Sven-Oliver Proksch |
| Tyyppi≠ | Automated coding and analysis of who-did-what-to-whom event records | Unsupervised latent-position model for word-count data |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Schrodt, P. A. (2012). Precedents, Progress, and Prospects in Political Event Data. International Interactions, 38(4), 546–569. DOI ↗ | Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S.-O. (2008). A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705–722. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | Event data coding, Political event data, Conflict event data, CAMEO event coding | Wordfish text scaling, Poisson scaling of texts, Unsupervised text scaling, Wordfish position estimation |
| Liittyvät≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Event data analysis converts streams of news reports into structured records of political interactions — who did what to whom, when — and aggregates them into time series of cooperation and conflict between actors. Each event is coded as a source actor, an action type drawn from an ontology such as CAMEO, a target actor, and a date. Modern systems extract these events automatically from millions of news stories, enabling near-real-time measurement of interstate and intrastate behavior for forecasting and analysis. | Wordfish scaling is an unsupervised text-as-data method that estimates a single latent position for each political document — a party manifesto, a legislative speech, a press release — directly from its word frequencies, without any reference texts or hand coding. Introduced by Slapin and Proksch in 2008, it models word counts as draws from a Poisson distribution whose rate depends on a document position and word-specific parameters, recovering, for example, a left–right ordering of parties purely from how often each word appears in each text. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|