Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Difference-in-Differences koulutustutkimuksessa× | Paneeliaineiston kiinteiden vaikutusten malli× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala≠ | Kausaalipäättely | Ekonometria |
| Menetelmäperhe | Regression model | Regression model |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1990s–2000s | 2014 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Dynarski, Card, Angrist, and colleagues — applied in education economics from the 1990s onward | Hsiao (textbook treatment); within transformation of panel data |
| Tyyppi≠ | Quasi-experimental causal inference | Panel data regression |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Dynarski, S. M. (2003). Does Aid Matter? Measuring the Effect of Student Aid on College Attendance and Completion. American Economic Review, 93(1), 279-288. DOI ↗ | Hsiao, C. (2014). Analysis of Panel Data (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | DiD in education, education DiD, quasi-experimental education design, education policy DiD | fixed effects model, within estimator, panel fixed-effects regression, Panel Veri — Sabit Etkiler Modeli |
| Liittyvät | 5 | 5 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Difference-in-Differences (DiD) in education research applies the classic quasi-experimental DiD estimator to evaluate education policies, programs, and reforms. Researchers compare changes in student, school, or district outcomes between a group exposed to an intervention and a comparable unexposed group across pre- and post-intervention periods, isolating policy effects from background trends. | The Panel Data Fixed Effects model estimates relationships from panel data (the same units observed over several time periods) while controlling for unit- and/or time-specific effects, supporting causal inference. It is developed as the within estimator in standard treatments such as Hsiao's Analysis of Panel Data (2014). |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|