Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Päätöksenteon kokeilu- ja arviointilaboratorio× | Vaihtoehtojen järjestysmenetelmä, jossa huomioidaan kaksivaiheinen normalisointi× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Päätöksenteko | Päätöksenteko |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1972 | 2022 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Gabus, A., Fontela, E. | Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. |
| Tyyppi≠ | Cause-effect influence network (total relation matrix) — produces prominence + relation for criteria weighting | Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Gabus, A., Fontela, E. (1972). World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Geneva, Switzerland link ↗ | Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | — | — |
| Liittyvät | 8 | 8 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Gabus, A., Fontela, E. in 1972. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|