Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Poikkileikkausaineiston viivästetty vaikutusmalli× | Paikalliset projektiot× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Ekonometria | Ekonometria |
| Menetelmäperhe | Regression model | Regression model |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2001 | 2005 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Pesaran, Shin, and Smith | Oscar Jorda |
| Tyyppi≠ | Distributed lag model | Multi-horizon regression |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships and dynamics. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. DOI ↗ | Jorda, O. (2005). Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections. American Economic Review, 95(1), 161-182. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet≠ | Panel distributed lag model | LP-IR, Multi-horizon regression |
| Liittyvät | 3 | 3 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | CS-DL (Cross-Sectional Distributed Lag) is a simplified dynamic panel model regressing outcomes on current and lagged explanatory variables without explicit autoregressive terms, while accounting for cross-sectional dependence. Built on Pesaran et al. (2001) and extended by Chudik et al. (2014), it estimates dynamic effects more parsimoniously than ARDL when autocorrelated lags are less critical. This approach is valuable for short-horizon effects and policy impact analysis. | Local Projections (LP) is a semi-parametric method for estimating impulse responses directly via multi-horizon regressions, bypassing VAR-model specification. Introduced by Jorda (2005), it projects outcomes h periods ahead onto current shocks and lags, producing impulse-response functions without assuming a particular lag structure or VAR order. This flexibility has made it the dominant approach in applied macroeconomics for measuring policy effects and shock transmission. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|