Vertaile menetelmiä

	Kompleksinen Proportionaalinen Arviointi	ANP	Paras-Huonoin -menetelmä
Tieteenala	Päätöksenteko	Päätöksenteko	Päätöksenteko
Menetelmäperhe	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Syntyvuosi	1996	1996	2015
Kehittäjä	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.	Saaty, T. L.	Rezaei, J.
Tyyppi	Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)	Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)	Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
Alkuperäislähde	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65	Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8	Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega
Rinnakkaisnimet	—	—	—
Liittyvät	8	8	8
Tiivistelmä	COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.