Vertaile menetelmiä

	Konferenssijulkaisu ja konferenssiesitelmien kokoelmat	Alkuperäinen tutkimusartikkeli	Vertaisarviointiprosessi
Tieteenala	Tieteellinen kirjoittaminen	Tieteellinen kirjoittaminen	Julkaisuetiikka
Menetelmäperhe	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Syntyvuosi	1900	1665	1665
Kehittäjä	Academic conferences (20th century formalization)	Scientific research community	Scientific publishing community; formalized by journals and COPE
Tyyppi	Document Type	Document Type	Process
Alkuperäislähde	International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. ICMJE.	International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. ICMJE.	Committee on Publication Ethics (2023). COPE Guidelines: Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers. COPE.
Rinnakkaisnimet	conference abstract, conference proceedings, conference presentation, poster presentation	research paper, empirical article, primary research, journal article	Peer Reviewing, Manuscript Evaluation, Scholarly Review
Liittyvät	2	5	4
Tiivistelmä	A conference paper is original research presented at an academic conference, typically via oral presentation or poster. Conference papers are published in proceedings (collection of papers from a conference) and indexed in databases (Scopus, Web of Science). Unlike journal articles requiring 12–24 months for publication, conference papers are disseminated rapidly (often within weeks or months), making them valuable for communicating cutting-edge findings and early-stage research. Peer review rigor varies: some conferences employ rigorous peer review; others are less selective. Conference papers often precede or parallel journal publication, facilitating scholarly dialogue and networking.	An original research article is the primary vehicle for reporting new empirical findings in a discipline. Following the IMRaD structure (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion), it represents a researcher's novel data, analysis, and interpretation. The journal article format has been the gold standard for scientific communication since the establishment of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society in 1665.	Peer review is the process by which manuscripts are evaluated by experts in the same field before publication in academic journals. Reviewers assess the manuscript's scientific merit, methodology, clarity, and contribution to the field. Established in 1665 with the first scientific journal (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society), peer review remains the gold standard for quality control in academic publishing. Despite ongoing criticism and proposals for alternatives, peer review continues to filter low-quality and unethical work, though it is imperfect and sometimes slow.