Vertaile menetelmiä

	Analytic Hierarchy Process	Paras-Huonoin -menetelmä	Monitahuketeoria
Tieteenala	Päätöksenteko	Päätöksenteko	Päätöksenteko
Menetelmäperhe	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Syntyvuosi	1980	2015	1976
Kehittäjä	Saaty, T. L.	Rezaei, J.	Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H.
Tyyppi	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP	Additive multi-attribute utility function
Alkuperäislähde	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega	Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. Wiley ISBN: 978-0-521-43883-4
Rinnakkaisnimet	—	—	—
Liittyvät	8	8	8
Tiivistelmä	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	MAUT (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. in 1976. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.