Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Toimintatutkimus× | Luokkahuonehavainnointi× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala≠ | Laadullinen tutkimus | Kenttämenetelmät |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1946 | 1960s (Flanders Interaction Analysis); refined through 1990s–2000s |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury | Ned Flanders (systematic interaction analysis); Robert Pianta et al. (CLASS system) |
| Tyyppi≠ | Method | Qualitative and quantitative observational research |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗ | Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing Teaching Behavior. Addison-Wesley. link ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet≠ | Participatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry | classroom observation research, structured classroom observation, instructional observation, lesson observation |
| Liittyvät≠ | 1 | 6 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement. | Classroom observation is a field research method in which a trained observer systematically watches, documents, and analyzes teaching and learning events as they occur in a real classroom setting. It can be structured (using a predefined coding instrument such as Flanders Interaction Analysis or CLASS), semi-structured, or open-ended (ethnographic notes), and is used across educational research, teacher professional development, school evaluation, and curriculum studies to generate ecologically valid evidence about instructional practice. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|