Public Goods Game
The public goods game is the canonical multi-person social dilemma used to study cooperation. Each member of a group is endowed with money and simultaneously decides how much to keep privately and how much to contribute to a common pool; the pool is multiplied and split equally among all members regardless of contribution. Because the marginal per-capita return is less than one but the group return exceeds one, every individual is privately better off free-riding while the group is collectively better off if all contribute -- the defining tension of a social dilemma. Experiments consistently show people contribute well above the self-interested zero, but contributions decay over repeated rounds unless institutions intervene. Fehr and Gachter's influential demonstration that allowing players to pay to punish free-riders restores and sustains high cooperation made the paradigm central to research on norms, altruistic punishment, and collective action.
مطالعهٔ کامل روش
برای خواندن این بخش با حساب رایگان وارد شوید.
نقشهٔ روش
همسایگی روشهای مرتبط — برای کاوش، یک گره را برگزینید.
منابع
- Fehr, E., & Gachter, S. (2000). Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments. American Economic Review, 90(4), 980-994. DOI: 10.1257/aer.90.4.980 ↗
- Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122-142. DOI: 10.1006/game.1995.1027 ↗
نحوهٔ استناد به این صفحه
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Public Goods Game (Voluntary Contribution Mechanism). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/fa/social-psychology/public-goods-game
کدام روش؟
این روش را در کنار نزدیکترین روشهای خویشاوندش بگذارید و آنها را کنار هم بخوانید — کتابخانه کتابها را روی میز میگشاید؛ انتخاب با شماست.
- Minimal Group Paradigmروانشناسی اجتماعی↔ مقایسه
- Social Relations Modelروانشناسی اجتماعی↔ مقایسه
- Trust Gameروانشناسی اجتماعی↔ مقایسه
ارجاعشده در
روشهای مشابه
در این صفحه مشکلی دیدید؟ گزارش دهید یا اصلاحی پیشنهاد کنید →