Site-Specific Installation
A site-specific work is made for one place and cannot be moved without changing or destroying its meaning. The famous removal of Richard Serra's Tilted Arc made the principle concrete: take the work out of its site and, the artist argued, you no longer have the work.
Definition
Installation and sculpture conceived for and bound to a particular location, such that the work's meaning depends on its physical, institutional, or social setting.
Scope
Covers site-specificity in installation and sculpture: the binding of a work to its physical, institutional, and social context, the contrast with the portable object, and the broadening of 'site' from fixed location to discursive and community-based engagement. Treats the theory and history of site-specificity; general installation is handled in the sibling topic.
Core questions
- What makes a work site-specific rather than simply placed in a location?
- Why does moving a site-specific work alter or destroy it?
- How has the meaning of 'site' shifted from physical place to discursive context?
- What did the Tilted Arc controversy reveal about site, public, and ownership?
Key concepts
- site-specificity
- phenomenological site
- discursive site
- locational identity
- displacement
- institutional context
Key theories
- Phenomenological versus discursive site
- Kwon traces a shift from an early phenomenological site-specificity bound to physical place toward a later 'discursive' model in which the site is an institutional, social, or thematic field that a work can address and even carry between locations.
- Place, performance, and documentation
- Kaye analyzes how site-specific work activates the particularities of place and is often known later only through its documentation, raising questions about where the work actually resides.
History
Site-specificity arose from Minimalism and Earthworks in the late 1960s, when artists tied works to particular spaces and landscapes. The 1989 removal of Serra's Tilted Arc from a New York plaza dramatized the stakes of moving such work. Kwon's 1997 essay and 2002 book then theorized a move from fixed physical site toward mobile, discursive, and community-based notions of site.
Debates
- Can site-specific work travel?
- Whether genuine site-specificity ties a work permanently to one location, so that relocation destroys it, or whether, as discursive models suggest, a work can address a kind of site and so move between places without losing its identity.
Key figures
- Miwon Kwon
- Nick Kaye
Related topics
Seminal works
- kwon2002
- kwon1997
- kaye2000
Frequently asked questions
- What does site-specific mean?
- A site-specific work is created for a particular place and depends on that setting for its meaning, so it cannot be relocated without altering or destroying the work; the site is treated as integral, not as a neutral backdrop.
- Why was Richard Serra's Tilted Arc controversial?
- Tilted Arc was a large steel sculpture made for a specific New York plaza; when public complaints led to its removal in 1989, Serra argued that because it was conceived for that exact site, taking it away effectively destroyed the work, making it a landmark case in debates over site-specificity and public art.