مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| تخصصیت× | دقت موزون× | دقت× | |
|---|---|---|---|
| حوزه | ارزیابی مدل | ارزیابی مدل | ارزیابی مدل |
| خانواده | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 20th century | 2010 | 20th century |
| پدیدآور≠ | Historical statistical foundations | Brodersen, Ong, Stephan, and Buhmann | Historical statistical foundations |
| نوع | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ | Brodersen, K. H., Ong, C. S., Stephan, K. E., & Buhmann, J. M. (2010). The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 3121-3124. DOI ↗ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ |
| نامهای دیگر | True Negative Rate, TNR | Average Recall, Equal-weight Average Sensitivity | Positive Predictive Value, PPV |
| مرتبط | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| خلاصه≠ | Specificity measures the proportion of actual negative cases that were correctly identified as negative by the classifier. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases that were truly negative, how many did we correctly reject?' Specificity is complementary to recall and is essential when false positives are costly. | Balanced accuracy is the average of recall values computed for each class separately. It corrects for class imbalance by giving equal weight to the performance on each class, regardless of class frequency in the dataset. | Precision measures the proportion of positive predictions that were actually correct. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases we predicted as positive, how many were truly positive?' Precision is critical in scenarios where false positives are costly. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|
|