مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| وزندهی امتیاز تمایل مکانی× | رگرسیون وزنی جغرافیایی (GWR)× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه≠ | استنتاج علّی | تحلیل فضایی |
| خانواده | Regression model | Regression model |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 2000s–2010s | 2002 |
| پدیدآور≠ | Extended from Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (2003) IPTW with spatial adaptations by Keele, Titiunik and others in geographically structured causal designs | Fotheringham, Brunsdon & Charlton |
| نوع≠ | Quasi-experimental / causal inference | Local spatial regression |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Keele, L., & Titiunik, R. (2015). Geographic Boundaries as Regression Discontinuities. Political Analysis, 23(1), 127-155. DOI ↗ | Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471496168 |
| نامهای دیگر | spatial PSW, geographically weighted propensity score weighting, spatial IPTW, spatially adjusted inverse probability weighting | GWR, local regression, spatially varying coefficient regression, Coğrafi Ağırlıklı Regresyon (GWR) |
| مرتبط≠ | 6 | 5 |
| خلاصه≠ | Spatial propensity score weighting extends inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to settings where units are geographically located and treatment assignment may depend on spatial factors such as location, neighborhood characteristics, or spatial clustering. By incorporating spatial covariates into the propensity score model and adjusting standard errors for spatial autocorrelation, it produces more credible causal estimates from observational geographic data. | Geographically Weighted Regression is a local regression method, introduced by Fotheringham, Brunsdon and Charlton (2002), that allows the regression coefficients to vary across space. Instead of one global equation, it fits a separate set of coefficients at every location, capturing spatial heterogeneity in the relationships. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|