مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| پژوهش علّی-مقایسهای با کمک شبیهسازی× | تطابق امتیاز تمایل (Propensity Score Matching)× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه≠ | طراحی پژوهش | آمار پژوهش |
| خانواده | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سال پیدایش≠ | Late 20th–early 21st century (hybrid approach formalized ~1990s–2000s) | 1983 |
| پدیدآور≠ | Synthesized from causal-comparative tradition (Donald T. Campbell; Julian Stanley) and simulation methodology | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| نوع≠ | Hybrid observational-simulation design | Method |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-1260087352 | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| نامهای دیگر≠ | simulation-augmented causal-comparative design, ex post facto simulation design, SA-CCR, causal-comparative with simulation validation | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| مرتبط≠ | 4 | 3 |
| خلاصه≠ | Simulation-assisted causal-comparative research is a hybrid observational design that combines the ex post facto logic of causal-comparative studies — comparing groups that differ on a naturally occurring variable — with computational simulation to strengthen causal inference, test counterfactuals, and assess the robustness of observed group differences. By augmenting real-world comparisons with simulated scenarios, researchers can explore causal mechanisms that cannot be manipulated experimentally. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|