ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

پژوهش علّی-مقایسه‌ای با کمک شبیه‌سازی×تطابق امتیاز تمایل (Propensity Score Matching)×
حوزهطراحی پژوهشآمار پژوهش
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایشLate 20th–early 21st century (hybrid approach formalized ~1990s–2000s)1983
پدیدآورSynthesized from causal-comparative tradition (Donald T. Campbell; Julian Stanley) and simulation methodologyPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
نوعHybrid observational-simulation designMethod
منبع بنیادینFraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-1260087352Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرsimulation-augmented causal-comparative design, ex post facto simulation design, SA-CCR, causal-comparative with simulation validationPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
مرتبط43
خلاصهSimulation-assisted causal-comparative research is a hybrid observational design that combines the ex post facto logic of causal-comparative studies — comparing groups that differ on a naturally occurring variable — with computational simulation to strengthen causal inference, test counterfactuals, and assess the robustness of observed group differences. By augmenting real-world comparisons with simulated scenarios, researchers can explore causal mechanisms that cannot be manipulated experimentally.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Simulation-assisted causal-comparative research · Propensity Score Matching. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-18 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare