ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

Rubric Development×Formative Assessment×
حوزهEducationEducation
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش20071998
پدیدآورPerformance-assessment tradition (Andrade; Arter & McTighe; Jonsson & Svingby synthesis)Scriven (term); Bloom; Black & Wiliam (modern synthesis)
نوعSystematic design of criterion-based scoring guides for performanceInstructional process using evidence of learning to adapt teaching and feedback
منبع بنیادینJonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. DOI ↗Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرScoring Rubric Design, Analytic and Holistic Rubrics, Performance Scoring Guides, Rubric ConstructionAssessment for Learning, Classroom Formative Assessment, Feedback-Based Assessment, Embedded Formative Assessment
مرتبط44
خلاصهRubric development is the systematic design of criterion-referenced scoring guides for judging complex performance such as writing, projects, presentations, and problem solving. A rubric specifies the dimensions on which work is evaluated and describes, in ordered levels, what each degree of quality looks like. Done well — as the syntheses by Andrade and by Jonsson and Svingby show — rubrics make scoring more reliable and transparent, clarify expectations for students, and turn assessment into a tool for learning rather than merely a verdict.Formative assessment, or assessment for learning, is the practice of gathering evidence of student understanding during instruction and using it immediately to adjust teaching and to give feedback that moves learning forward. Unlike summative assessment, which measures learning after the fact for grading or accountability, formative assessment is woven into the teaching cycle. Synthesized influentially by Black and Wiliam, it is defined not by the type of instrument but by whether the resulting evidence actually changes subsequent instruction and learning.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Rubric Development · Formative Assessment. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-24 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare