ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

مطالعه دقت تشخیصی تعدیل‌شده با ریسک×تحلیل ROC (مشخصه عملكرد گیرنده)×
حوزهاپیدمیولوژیآمار
خانوادهProcess / pipelineHypothesis test
سال پیدایشConceptual roots 1980s–1990s; covariate-adjusted ROC formally introduced 20091954 (signal detection); 1982 (AUC formalization)
پدیدآورMargaret Pepe and colleagues; covariate-adjusted ROC formalized by Janes & Pepe (2009)Peterson, Birdsall & Fox (signal detection theory); Hanley & McNeil (medical statistics)
نوعObservational clinical study design with covariate adjustmentDiagnostic accuracy evaluation
منبع بنیادینPepe, M. S. (2003). The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198509844Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143(1), 29–36. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرcase-mix-adjusted diagnostic accuracy, stratified diagnostic accuracy study, covariate-adjusted diagnostic accuracy, risk-stratified DTA studyROC curve analysis, AUC analysis, sensitivity-specificity analysis, diagnostic accuracy analysis
مرتبط64
خلاصهA risk-adjusted diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well an index test identifies a target condition while explicitly accounting for patient-level risk factors that influence either disease prevalence or test performance. By adjusting for case-mix, it yields accuracy estimates — sensitivity, specificity, and AUC — that are not confounded by the composition of the study sample, enabling fairer comparisons across populations and clinical settings.ROC analysis evaluates how well a continuous or ordinal test variable discriminates between two binary outcome classes. By plotting the true positive rate (sensitivity) against the false positive rate (1 − specificity) across all decision thresholds, it produces a curve whose area under the curve (AUC) quantifies overall discriminative power, ranging from 0.5 (chance) to 1.0 (perfect discrimination).
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Risk-adjusted diagnostic accuracy study · ROC analysis. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-17 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare