ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

مطالعه کوهورت تعدیل‌شده بر اساس ریسک×تطابق امتیاز تمایل (Propensity Score Matching)×
حوزهاپیدمیولوژیآمار پژوهش
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایشMid–late 20th century (risk-adjusted cohort designs systematized by 1970s–1990s)1983
پدیدآورEvolution of cohort study methodology; risk adjustment formalized through work of Rothman, Greenland, and others in epidemiology, 20th centuryPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
نوعObservational epidemiological study design with statistical confounding controlMethod
منبع بنیادینRothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرadjusted cohort study, covariate-adjusted cohort, risk-controlled prospective study, propensity-adjusted cohortPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
مرتبط43
خلاصهA risk-adjusted cohort study is an observational epidemiological design in which a defined group of individuals is followed over time to compare outcomes between exposed and unexposed subgroups, with statistical methods applied to control for measured confounders. Adjustment strategies — including multivariable regression, propensity score matching, inverse probability weighting, or standardization — are used to reduce bias and produce effect estimates that more closely approximate what would be observed in a randomized trial.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Risk-adjusted cohort study · Propensity Score Matching. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-18 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare